June 21, 2010

"Whoever says that there was a coup here (in Honduras)is crazy," says Panamanian Ricardo Maduro, Honduras en lucha!, 21st june 2010


Ricardo Maduro (photo) with Roberto Micheletti was part of the coup against the constitutional president, Manuel Zelaya in June 2009.He is a former President of Honduras and chairman of the Bank of Honduras

http://fwd4.me/TpK
Source: Honduras en Lucha! , June 21, 2010

The former president Ricardo Maduro (2002-2006)who masterminded the coup...said that the Honduran coup which occurred in June 2009, was a total success, because "culture, peace and democracy" must prevail over foreign interference.

US Supreme Court Boosts Federal Prosecutors in Terror Cases, Monday 21 June 2010, by: Michael Doyle | McClatchy Newspapers

Source: Truthout

http://fwd4.me/Tp8


Washington - The Supreme Court on Monday bolstered law enforcement in national security cases, permitting prosecution of U.S. organizations that provide non-violent legal training or advice to designated terrorist groups.

Honduran Military and police kill boy and arrest five peasants, from: Honduras en lucha! Source: defensoresenlinea.com , June 21, 2010




http://fwd4.me/Tou

The farmer Oscar Geovanny Ramirez (age 16) was killed and five others arrested in a violent operation that involved the police and army, the Cooperativa La Aurora, the Peasant Movement Unified Aguán, MUCA, on Sunday June 20 between 9 : 30 to 10:00 am.

A flash of lightning By Uri Avnery, Aljazeera.com 21/06/2010


Uri Avnery

Our government's action against the Gaza aid flotilla was such a lightning flash. Israelis normally live in darkness as far as seeing the world is concerned.

By Uri Avnery

http://fwd4.me/Toc

NIGHT. UTTER darkness. Heavy rain. Visibility close to nil.

And suddenly a flash of lightning. For a fraction of a second, the landscape is lit up. For this split second, the terrain surrounding us can be seen. It is not the way it used to be.

OUR GOVERNMENT action against the Gaza aid flotilla was such a lightning flash.

Israelis normally live in darkness as far as seeing the world is concerned. But for that instant, the real landscape around us could be seen, and it looked frightening. Then the darkness settled down over us, Israel returned to its bubble, the world disappeared from view.

This split second was enough to reveal a dismal scene. On almost all fronts, the situation of the State of Israel has worsened since the last flash of lightning.

The flotilla and the attack on it did not create this landscape. It has been there since our present government was set up. But the deterioration did not start even then. It began a long time before.

The action of Ehud Barak & Co. only lit up the situation as it is now, and gave it yet another push in the wrong direction.

How does the new landscape look in the light of Barak¡¯s barak? ("barak" means lightning in Hebrew.)

THE LIST is headed by a fact that nobody seems to have noticed until now: the death of the Holocaust.

In all the tumult this affair has caused throughout the world, the Holocaust was not even mentioned. True, in Israel there were some who called Recep Tayyip Erdogan "a new Hitler", and some Israel-haters talked about the "Nazi attack", but the Holocaust has practically disappeared.

For two generations, our foreign policy used the Holocaust as its main instrument. The bad conscience of the world determined its attitude towards Israel. The (justified) guilt feelings ¨C either for atrocities committed or for looking the other way ¨C caused Europe and America to treat Israel differently than any other nation ¨C from nuclear armaments to the settlements. All criticism of our governments¡¯ actions was branded automatically as anti-Semitism and silenced.

But time does its work. New tragedies have blunted the world¡¯s senses. For a new generation, the Holocaust is a thing of the remote past, a chapter of history. The sense of guilt has disappeared in all countries, except Germany.

The Israeli public did not notice this, because in Israel itself the Shoah is alive and present. Many Israelis are children or grandchildren of Holocaust survivors, and the Holocaust has been imprinted on their childhood. Moreover, a huge apparatus ensures that the Holocaust will not disappear from our memory, starting from kindergarten, through ceremonies and memorial days, to organized tours "there".

Therefore, the Israeli public is shocked to see that the Holocaust has lost its power as a political instrument. Our most valuable weapon has become blunt.

THE CENTRAL pillar of our policy is our alliance with the United States. To use a phrase dear to Binyamin Netanyahu (in another context): it¡¯s "the rock of our existence".

For many years, this alliance has kept us safe from all trouble. We knew that we could always get from the US all we needed: advanced arms to retain our superiority over all Arab armies combined, munitions in times of war, money for our economy, the veto on all UN Security Council resolutions against us, automatic support for all the actions of our successive governments. Every small and medium country in the world knew that in order to gain entrance to the palaces of Washington, the Israeli doorkeeper had to be bribed.

But during the last year, cracks have appeared in this pillar. Not the small scratches and chips of wear and tear, but cracks caused by shifts of the ground. The mutual aversion between Barack Obama and Binyamin Netanyahu is only one symptom of a much deeper problem,

The Chief of the Mossad told the Knesset last week: "For the US, we have ceased to be an asset and become a burden."

This fact was put into incisive words by General David Petraeus, when he said that the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict is endangering the lives of American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. The later soothing messages did not erase the significance of this warning. (When Petraeus fainted this week at a Senate hearing, some religious Jews viewed it as divine punishment.)

IT IS not only the Israeli-American relationship that has undergone a fateful change, but the standing of the US itself is changing for the worse, a bad omen indeed for the future of Israeli policy.

The world is changing, slowly and quietly. The US is still by far the most powerful country, but it is no longer the almighty superpower it had been since 1989. China is flexing its muscles, countries like India and Brazil are getting stronger, countries like Turkey ¨C yes, Turkey! ¨C are beginning to play a role.

This is not a matter of one or two years, but anyone who is thinking about the future of Israel in ten, twenty years must understand that unless there is a basic change in our position, our position, too, will decline.

¡¡

IF OUR alliance with the US is one central pillar of Israeli policy, the support of the vast majority of world Jewry is the second.

For 62 years, we could count on it with our eyes shut. Whatever we did ¨C almost all the world¡¯s Jews stood at attention and saluted. In fire and water, victory or defeat, glorious or dark chapters ¨C the world¡¯s Jews did support us, giving money, demonstrating, pressuring their governments. Without second thoughts, without criticism.

Not anymore. Quietly, almost silently, cracks have appeared in this pillar, too. Opinion polls show that most American Jewish young people are turning away from Israel. Not shifting their loyalty from the Israeli establishment to Israel¡¯s liberal camp ¨C but turning away from Israel altogether.

This will not be felt immediately either. AIPAC continues to strike fear into Washingtonian hearts, Congress will continue to dance to its tune. But when the new generation comes to man key positions, the support for Israel will erode, American politicians will stop crawling on their bellies and the US administration will gradually change its relations with us.

IN OUR immediate neighborhood, too, profound changes are underway, some of them beneath the surface. The flotilla incident has exposed them.

The influence of our allies is decreasing constantly. They are losing height, and an old-new power is on the rise: Turkey.

Hosni Mubarak is busy with his efforts to pass power to his son, Gamal. The Islamic opposition in Egypt is raising its head. Saudi money is trumped by the new attraction of Turkey. The Jordanian king is compelled to adapt himself. The axis of Turkey-Iran-Syria-Hezbollah-Hamas is the rising power, the axis of Egypt-Saudi Arabia-Jordan-Fatah is in decline.

BUT THE most important change is the one that is taking place in international public opinion. Any derision of this reminds one of Stalin¡¯s famous sneer ("How many divisions has the pope?")

Recently, an Israeli TV station showed a fascinating film about the German and Scandinavian female volunteers who flooded Israel in the 50s and 60s to live and work (and sometimes marry) in the kibbutzim. Israel was then seen as a plucky little nation surrounded by hateful enemies, a state risen from the ashes of the Holocaust to become a haven of freedom, equality and democracy, which found their most sublime expression in that unique creation, the kibbutz.

The present generation of idealistic youngsters from all over the world, male and female, who would once have volunteered for the kibbutzim, can now be found on the decks of the ships sailing for downtrodden, choked and starved Gaza, which touches the hearts of many young people. The pioneering Israeli David has turned into a brutish Israeli Goliath.

Even a genius of spin could not change this. For years, now, the world sees the State of Israel every day on the TV screen and on the front pages in the image of heavily armed soldiers shooting at stone-throwing children, guns firing phosphorus shells into residential quarters, helicopters executing "targeted eliminations", and now pirates attacking civilian ships on the open seas. Terrified women with wounded babies in their arms, men with amputated limbs, demolished homes. When one sees a hundred pictures like that for every picture that shows another Israel, Israel becomes a monster. The more so since the Israeli propaganda machine is successfully suppressing any news about the Israeli peace camp.

MANY YEARS ago, when I wanted to ridicule the addiction of our leaders to the use of force, I paraphrased a saying that reflects much of Jewish wisdom: "if force does not work, use brains." In order to show how far we, the Israelis, are different from the Jews, I changed the words: "If force doesn¡¯t work, use more force."

I thought of it as a joke. But, as happens to many jokes in our country, it has become reality. It is now the credo of many primitive Israelis, headed by Ehud Barak.

In practice, the security of a state depends on many factors, and military force is but one of them. In the long run, world public opinion is stronger. The pope has many divisions.

In many respects, Israel is still a strong country. But, as the sudden illumination of the flotilla affair has shown, time is not working in our favour. We should deepen our roots in the world and in the region ¨C which means making peace with our neighbours ¨C as long as we are as strong as we are now.

If force doesn't work, more force will not necessarily work either.

If force doesn't work, force doesn't work. Period.


-- Uri Avnery, an Israeli writer and peace activist, founded the Gush Shalom movement. He had served three terms as an MP at the Knesset. This article was published by Gush Shalom.



-- Middle East Online

© aljazeera.com

A Quebec Communist replies To CPUSA's Sam Webb re: "A cautionary tale" People's World, June 18 2010

A Quebec Communist replies To Sam Webb's "cautionary tale",
People's World, June 18 2010

http://fwd4.me/Tl1


To Sam Webb,

I don't agree with you. Of course, I don't know much about the USA; however I realize that there is not such a thing as the Left in your country. There are political groups that are of the extreme left, such as Trotskyists and there is also the Communist Party USA. I would never say that the Democratic Party that is reluctant to adopt the law on Health Care for some members is a progressive organization. In Canada, more precisely in the french province of Québec, there is the Québec solidaire party that gathers different groups and the communists. They have one elected Member at the National Assembly out of 125 deputies. His main concern is for the workers of Québec.

Of course, communists are ready to represent workers in the National Assembly (Parliament) and promote their interests such as the purchasing power and the defence of their standards of living and also their national rights (french language and culture).

Engels never said, never, that communists should present hidden candidates. Earlier he said even that elections were a powerful mean to measure the support of the population in regard with the communist party and its number amongst the people.
Now, if there would be a fascist threat in Canada, the Communist Party would immediately call for the unity of all democrats; it is not the case in my country and it is not the case in USA.

The US workers are at the moment more pragmatic than communist, but they have less and less confidence in the system, that is the capitalist system. IN 2008, it was a blow against racism and not against capitalism (and imperialism). It seems obvious that the communists in USA must reach the working people, engage into campaign that will benefit the workers and struggle for their well-being. It must be an independent campaign against b ig US mnopolies to start with.
In the canadian media, they say that Obama is less popular in USA. One can understand it easily since he does not live up with electoral promises and the dire economical situation of workers'families.

I know that I mention very often the word "workers", it is needed since they are the majority of the people living in USA. They deserve to be listened to. The Communist Party must be on their side and fight for their interests first. Maybe, democratic minded people will accompany them, including Democrats, but in this class struggle, the toilers must have the last word.

Posted by Daniel Paquet, 06/19/2010
Daniel Paquet studied Communications at Montréal’s Québec University from 1993 to 1996, where he graduated in journalism with honours

Zionists fighting Peace - How Israel lost its soul, Media Monitors, by Mohamed Elmasry, Wednesday, June 17, 2009




http://fwd4.me/Tko

"Israeli society is in love with war and Tzahal: because they give the average citizen a feeling of contradictory safety; because they develop the mind and muscle of the economy and help them fill their pockets; and because war and preparation for war tally with the dynamic development of Israeli industrial life. Further more, war IS the only possibility, when your aim is to live alone in a country where another people lives as well.

Israel’s Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu laid out "his vision" of peace last week. This vision was, in a word, expected. After all, he is a hard-core Zionist Jew:

"If we receive this guarantee regarding demilitarization and Israel’s security needs, and if the Palestinians recognize Israel as the state of the Jewish people, then we will be ready in a future peace agreement to reach a solution where a demilitarized Palestinian state exists alongside the Jewish state."

Netanyahu also said Israel would not recognize the right of return for Palestinian refugees, saying that the problem must be solved outside of the Jewish state.

To understand why Netanyahu’s vision, which can be described as fighting peace, is supported by many Israelis one must know how Israelis are indoctrinated in Zionism and how violent militarism is not only a Zionist ideal but an economical and a sociological necessity.

One of the best books on the subject is How Israel Lost Its Soul, by Maxim Ghilan, a Zionist Jew who left Israel in 1969, having been "forced to reconsider his nationalist Jewish stand" :

"Tzahal (the Israeli Defense Forces) is not only an army: it is a state within a state, a security apparatus, an extremely dynamic economic empire, a never diminishing source of managerial manpower for the civil economy ... But first and foremost for the average Israeli, Tzahal is the main channel of his indoctrination, the symbol of the identity he wears, in fact and in thought, when he feels insecure or knows himself to be under attack. Zionist history, which in a totally insipid and slanted form, is pushed down pupils throats in Israeli classrooms. (Tzahal drafts 18-year-old boys for three years and girls for two years.)

"[Once drafted he] does not have to fight for his basic needs: home, food, the usual comforts, transport, health insurance-all these are provided by the State. Even his family is taken care of, should he fall in battle. He can, then, afford to be mildly critical, at times-as long as his criticism is unrelated to war.

"[A University student] is either fighting two months a year in the reserves, or has just completed three years of army duty ... upon completing his studies he will have a good deal of useful knowledge and a position which will be almost automatically allotted to him by the manpower-hungry (Zionist) Establishment. He will have the two necessary attributes: knowledge and Jewishness.

"He thus reaches his conclusions, out of his own vested interests but without real knowledge or personal experience of the social and military roots of the conflict upon which his society is based. His future, his economic interests and past military indoctrination all tend to add up and force him to ignore ‘dangerous’ facts such as racialists exclusivity and perennial war.

"Israeli society is in love with war and Tzahal: because they give the average citizen a feeling of contradictory safety; because they develop the mind and muscle of the economy and help them fill their pockets; and because war and preparation for war tally with the dynamic development of Israeli industrial life. Further more, war IS the only possibility, when your aim is to live alone in a country where another people lives as well.

"Israel has gradually become a more and more openly racist country. Anyone not Jewish is at best second-class in Israel... A Jew has inherent rights in Israel even if he is not born in the State. A Jew is considered an insider, while a ‘Goy’ (Gentile, non-Jew) always remains an outsider, even if born inside the country ... In the State of Israel, officially defined as ‘Jewish’ just as Rhodesia’s or South Africa’s (were) ‘white’, this is a most important means of personal tyranny.

"As Israel progressed towards its consecration as a ‘pure Jewish’ state, it found itself giving more and more power to those zealots who held Zionist-religious views."

Ghilan ends by citing the example of Giora Neumann, who went to military jail for refusing to serve in an "imperialist army," and those of a growing number of young Israelis who wish to "escape the nightmare of unending war." If more Israelis turn into Neumanns then and only then will "peace with an independent Arab Palestine and rapprochement between this Palestine and Israel would finally become a possibility."

June 20, 2010

CUPE ONTARIO : INTERNAL DIVISIONS CONSUME CONVENTION, By Helen Kennedy, Toronto, June 16-30, 2010 issue of People's Voice




(The following article is from the June 16-30, 2010 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 706 Clark Drive, Vancouver, BC, V5L 3J1.)



CUPE Ontario has emerged from its recent convention in Windsor with divisions in its leadership and budget cuts that could hamper its ability to act as one of Canada's leading social unions. The union that has been on the leading edge of many critical debates in the labour movement over the past decade has been hobbled by an accumulated deficit. And, instead of coming out strongly in defence of free collective bargaining in the face of a provincial government that is creating a wage-freeze environment, the leadership appears to be consumed by internal divisions.

The CUPE Ontario officers, President Fred Hahn and Secretary-Treasurer, Candace Rennick, were elected by the Executive Board when previous president Sid Ryan moved on to become president of the Ontario Federation of Labour in November 2009. Ryan had led CUPE Ontario for 17 years and provided much of the impetus within CUPE for a strong fightback against privatization, for supports for coordinated bargaining and for being a staunch defender of Palestine.

In Ontario, the March budget did nothing to stem the corporate tax cuts, which, according to Hugh Mackenzie at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, will cost an additional $2.5 billion by 2012-13. Savings of course will be taken by implementing a wage freeze for all provincially funded organizations (eg. front-line, low-paid social and community service organizations) and all provincial collective agreements that expire over the next two years. Transit funding to expand Toronto's sorely needed infrastructure was slashed and postponed. The poor will see fewer benefits with a miserly 1% increase in social assistance combined with the elimination of the "special diet program" that thousands have relied on to supplement their families' nutritional intake.

However, from the onset of the Convention, the CUPE Ontario budget defined much of the debate. In her first report, Rennick revealed that CUPE Ontario had a deficit of just over $1 million and that CUPE Ontario was "insolvent." While the fiscal year deficit was close to $500,000, deficits from past years stood at over $500,000.

The current year deficit was the result of a variety of factors. Several staff in the CUPE Ontario office have been on extended sick leaves and their positions were back-filled through book-offs. The budget overage in this category was almost $300,000. Other areas in which CUPE Ontario spent more than budgeted included $85,000 in strike support, over $100,000 in campaign costs that were disallowed by the National, over $100,000 in convention costs, and increased translation costs. Despite losing its largest affiliate (Local 79, inside municipal workers in Toronto), dues income exceeded revenue targets, due to the decision at the 2008 Convention to convert to a percentage system which results in automatic increases with wage settlements.

Rennick's proposed solution to the financial "crisis" was that CUPE Ontario had requested CUPE National co-sign a loan to assist the Division in "offering relief and a path to financial stability." CUPE National's conditions? "A review of [CUPE Ontario's] finances and operations to better understand the seriousness of the situation and to help in identifying the most accurate amount of financing required." An auditing firm from Winnipeg was brought it to conduct the review. The result, published and distributed to the floor as the "Management Letter for Financial Structuring", outlined 103 recommendations, that if implemented would result in the National's signature on a loan agreement.

Other recommendations include gapping and staff lay-offs, making it more difficult to book-off activists, especially those from smaller and more female-dominated locals, and establishing a "budgeting culture" at CUPE Ontario.

The Action Caucus, which met at the convention, were alarmed with the strategy that would make CUPE Ontario more dependent on the National Union, given the latter's move to the right over the past seven years. The Caucus considered a suggestion from CUPE 3902 (University of Toronto) for locals to lend the Division the money needed to address the deficit - a plan that would allow CUPE Ontario to retain its fighting activism. As the convention ended, the Executive Board had met with those locals interested in pursing this possibility.

Was there any good news coming from the convention? Aside from the very few resolutions being passed, the Convention did pass a 2010 Action Plan that outlines a progressive fightback. Priorities for CUPE Ontario include building resistance to the Liberal government's "Open Ontario" plan, reaffirming a commitment to "no-concession" bargaining, strengthening sectoral and pattern bargaining, fighting privatization, strengthening collaboration with social movements, defend defined-benefit pension plans and fight to win progressive candidates to City Councils and School Boards in the upcoming municipal elections.

The newly elected Executive Board needs to play a lead role in moving CUPE Ontario forward by implementing the 2010 Action Plan, despite the gloomy internal budget picture. CUPE Ontario needs to be at the forefront of a massive fightback against the provincial government's attack on public services. Strengthening the Action Caucus within CUPE Ontario is also essential. It is also the best way to strengthen left-centre unity and shore up CUPE Ontario as one of Canada's leading social unions.

Featured Story

Dejemos que la izquierda de Estados Unidos tenga cuidado! por Andrew Taylor 23.06.2021

La Administración Biden ha habilitado una nueva "Iniciativa contra el terrorismo doméstico" para defender "The Homeland"...