Wahhabis, the Brotherhood and the Empire: Syria and the Limits of Political Islam (2/2) by Tim Anderson, 19 August 2013

Paper at the ‘Competing Visions in the Muslim World’ conference, University of Sydney, 14-16 August 2013

PART II



2. Insurrections by Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood

When the ‘Arab Spring’ erupted in Tunisia, then Egypt and Libya, Salafi groups and the Muslim Brotherhood became the beneficiaries of change. Syria saw an armed Islamist insurrection, under cover of political reform protests. Contrary to the western promotion of the notion that there was a secular rebellion in Syria, which gradually attracted more Islamist-jihadis or, alternatively, was ‘hijacked’ by Islamist-jihadis, the armed groups in Syria’s 2011-2013 conflict have always been overwhelmingly Islamist and mostly allied to the Muslim Brotherhood. The idea of a moderate Muslim Brotherhood at odds with violent jihadis also has some traction in western writing (e.g. Leiken and Brooke 2007: 107) but little grounding in Syrian experience. Indeed, the extreme ‘takfiri’ ideas, where those of other faiths can be attacked and killed (al-Amin 2012) has been part of the Syrian brotherhood at least since the late 1970s. These ideas were encouraged by the Saudi-Wahhabi sponsors of Syria’s 2011 insurrection, and seem to have become well embedded in most of the ‘Free Syrian Army’ groups.



This section will demonstrate that the first armed attacks in Dara in March 2011 were not by government troops on civilian demonstrators, but by Saudi-supplied Islamists on security forces and civilians (Daily Mail 2011; Queenan 2011; Truth Syria 2012), and that the 2011 insurrection was always Salafi-Islamist dominated. The Dara attacks closely shadowed the modus operandi of the Brotherhood’s earlier failed insurrection in Hama, in 1982. The political reform movement of 2011 was rapidly derailed by the armed attacks, which drew in government forces. This conflict has been prolonged because a coalition of outside governments, committed to regime change in Syria, armed the insurgency and, when local efforts stalled, sent in thousands of foreign Salafi-jihadis. By 2013, despite some reshuffles, the leadership of both the exile political leadership of the ‘revolution’ and the Supreme Military Council of the ‘Free Syrian Army’ were both still firmly in the hands of Salafi groups, dominated by the Brotherhood (Barkan 2013: 5).



What is distinct about Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood? It has its own history characteristics, though all its public positions have been closely aligned with the Egyptian Brotherhood, including the brief Brotherhood-led government in Cairo (Draitser 2012). It came to Syria from Egypt as a parliamentary group in the late 1940s yet, by the 1960s it began to focus on the Alawi leaders in the Ba’ath Party as heretics who could not represent Muslims. From then on the Brotherhood began to engage in battles with the secular government (Teitelbaum 2004: 135, 154). The Brotherhood put its representatives forward as ‘the natural spokesmen of the Sunni community’ and tried to characterise its conflict with the Ba’thist Government as ‘a conflict between Sunnis and Alawis’ (Batatu 1982: 13). Nevertheless, according to Batatu, it was never the religious beliefs of the Sunnis which were under threat from the Ba’athists, but rather ‘the social interests of the upper and middle elements of their landed, mercantile and manufacturing classes’ (Batatu 1982: 13). The Brotherhood’s program, like that of the mother party in Egypt, emphasised liberal freedoms and also the transfer of state enterprises to private hands, consistent with ‘the outlook and interests of the urban Sunni trading and manufacturing classes’ (Batatu 1982: 13-14).



The Brotherhood had been marginalised in the early 1960s, when there was a brief union between Egypt and Syria (the United Arab Republic); a union with a charter which contained ‘a baffling combination of … [ideas] in addition to nationalist and religious sentiments – Marxian socialism, side by side with Egyptian revolutionism, Arab nationalism with internationalism, secular politics with Islamic precepts’ (Najjar 1968: 184). Yet Islam was not declared the state religion in the charter of the UAR (Parker 1962: 19), nor would it enter the Syrian constitution. Hafez al Assad, who came to the Presidency in 1971, kept Islam out of Syria’s constitution but agreed to a compromise where the head of state had to be a Muslim. In 1972 he got a senior Iraqi Shi’ia cleric to recognise Alawis as a branch of the Shi’ite community. Despite this, the Brotherhood considered him and all Alawis as non-Muslims (Talhamy 2009: 566-7).



The Brotherhood’s opposition became more violent in the late 1970s (Batatu 1982: 19-20). Despite narrow Salafi doctrine they were said to have been inspired by the Iranian Islamic Revolution of 1979, and sought Iran’s help against Syria’s secular system. However they received no response from Iranian leader Ayatollah Ruhullah al-Khomeini (Batatu 1982: 13). Shortly after this Sa’id Hawwa, the Syrian Brotherhood’s chief ideologist, ‘stressed that the people of the Sunna are the real Muslim community, thus widening the gap between the Muslim Brothers and Iran’ (Talhamy 2009: 570; Batatu 1982:13). This anti-Shia stance linked to the Wahhabi theory of a Iran-Syria-Hezbollah Shia ‘threat’, which was attempting ‘to stir up fears … of a possible Shiite takeover of Syria and other Sunni states’ (Talhamy 2009: 579).



With the Ba’th system well entrenched, the Brotherhood banned for its violent attacks and President Hafez al Assad showing few concessions to Islamism, the Islamist group began a series of bold and bloody insurrectionary moves. The group’s takfiri thinking was demonstrated in 1979 when it launched a series of attacks on Alawis, as well as government officials, including the massacre of several dozen young Alawi cadets at an Aleppo military school (Seale 1988: 325). The government jailed and executed many Brotherhood members, accusing the group of being subservient to Israel and the US. In April 1980 armed clashes in Aleppo left more than a thousand dead (Seale 1988: 328; Talhamy 2009: 567). By mid-1980, according to US intelligence, President Hafez al Asad had ‘broken the back’ of the Brotherhood’s rebellion. Despite this, a new strategy was launched in 1981, after death of Brotherhood leader Issam Attar, with the aim of an Alawite coup. However the plot was exposed and the Brotherhood ‘felt pressured into initiating’ an uprising in their stronghold of Hama (DIA 1982).

As Patrick Seale describes it, the uprising in Hama began this way:

‘At 2am on the night of 2-3 February 1982 an army unit combing the old city fell into an ambush. Roof top snipers killed perhaps a score of soldiers … [Brotherhood leader] Abu Bakr [Umar Jawwad] gave the order for a general uprising … hundreds of Islamist fighters rose … by the morning some seventy leading Ba’athists had been slaughtered and the triumphant guerrillas declared the city ‘liberated’ (Seale 1988: 332).

The Syrian Arab Army responded with a huge force of about 12,000 and the battle raged for three weeks. It was a civil war, and there were defections. Seale continues:

‘As the tide turned slowly in the government’s favour, the guerrillas fell back into the old quarters … after heavy shelling, commandos and party irregulars supported by tanks moved in … many civilians were slaughtered in the prolonged mopping up, whole districts razed’ (Seale 1988: 333).

Final accounts of the casualties vary, with the independent, more contemporary accounts putting a total death toll at between 2,000 and 10,000. US intelligence wrote: ‘The total causalities for the Hama incident probably number about 2,000. This includes an estimated 300 to 400 members of the Muslim Brotherhood’s elite ‘Secret Apparatus’ (DIA 1982: 7). Patrick Seale notes that government forces also suffered heavy losses, but that ‘large numbers died in the hunt for the gunmen … government sympathizers estimating a mere 3,000 and critics as many as 20,000 … a figure of 5,000 to 10,000 could be close to the truth’ He adds: ‘The guerrillas were formidable opponents. They had a fortune in foreign money … [and] no fewer than 15,000 machine guns’ (Seale 1988: 335). Subsequent accounts have often inflated the casualties.



Hafez blamed a large scale foreign conspiracy for the Hama insurrection. Seale observes that he was ‘not paranoical’, as many US weapons were captured and foreign backing had come from several US collaborators: King Hussayn of Jordan, Lebanese Christian militias (the Israeli-aligned ‘Guardians of the Cedar’) and Saddam Hussein in Iraq (Seale 1988: 336-337). Despite the US hand in the conflict, US intelligence held the outcome at arm’s length, dryly observing that: ‘the Syrians are pragmatists who do not want a Muslim Brotherhood government’ (DIA 1982: vii).



Almost 30 years later the insurrection in Dara in March 2011 began in a very similar way, but under the cover of political reform rallies and counter pro-government rallies, sparked by the much publicised ‘Arab Spring’. But this was to be another ‘Islamist Spring’. There were reports, several days before the rallies of mid-March, of arms being smuggled into the country (Reuters 2011), and then being distributed from Dara’s al-Omari Mosque (Truth Syria 2012). Yet many western media accounts ignored the armed insurrection, maintaining a remarkably monolithic ‘peaceful protestors’ line, for many months. Understanding some of the detail is important.



In early March some teenagers in Daraa were arrested for graffiti that had been copied from North Africa ‘the people want to overthrow the regime’. It was reported that they were abused by local police. Time magazine reported that President Assad intervened, the local governor was sacked and the teenagers were released. What followed was highly contested. The western media version is that protestors burned and trashed government offices and that ‘provincial security forces opened fire on marchers, killing several’ (Abouzeid 2011). After that, ‘protestors' staged demonstrations in front of the al-Omari mosque, but were in turn attacked’. The demonstrations were said to involve crowds of up to 300,000, with 15 anti-government ‘protesters’ killed (AP 2011). Yet Dara is a border town with just 150,000 inhabitants.



The Syrian government, on the other hand, stated that armed attacks had begun on security forces, killing several police, along with the burning of government offices. There was corroboration of this account. While its headline blamed security forces for killing ‘protesters’, the British Daily Mail showed pictures of guns, AK47 rifles and hand grenades that security forces had recovered from the al-Omari mosque. The report notes that ‘an armed gang’ had opened fire on an ambulance, killing ‘a doctor, a paramedic and a policeman’ (Daily Mail 2011). Israeli and Lebanese media also gave versions of the events of 17-18 March closer to that of the Syrian government. An Israel news report said ‘seven police officers and at least four demonstrators in Syria have been killed’, while the Ba’ath party headquarters and courthouse ‘were torched’. Police had been targeted by rooftop snipers (Queenan 2011).



Al Jazeera (2011), owned by Qatar's royal family, key financial backers of the Muslim Brotherhood, implied the rooftop snipers in Dara were government forces, however the claim that secret police snipers were killing ‘soldiers and protestors alike’ was both illogical and out of sequence. The armed forces came to Dara because police had been killed by snipers. Once in Dara they engaged in a fire-fight and stormed the Omari mosque to seize the arms. Saudi official Anwar Al-Eshki would later confirm to the BBC that these arms had indeed been provided to militants in Dara, supposedly for self-defence (Truth Syria 2012). However evidence shows these arms were provided before the violence broke out.



Despite this the western media, almost unanimously, went on to report for many months that armed opposition in Syria did not exist. Government violence was said to have been used against ‘peaceful protestors’. Only many months later did these protestors take up arms. The US-based group Human Rights Watch claimed ‘protestors only used violence against the security forces’ in response to killings by the security forces or ‘as a last resort’ (HRW 2011). This was a terrible deceit. Washington’s allies – at first Saudi Arabia then later Qatar, Turkey and some elements in Lebanon – were sponsoring the armed insurrection, through established Brotherhood channels. In October 2011 the Istanbul-based Arab history academic Professor Jeremy Salt observed: ‘The claim that armed opposition to the government has begun only recently is a complete lie. The killings of soldiers, police and civilians, often in the most brutal circumstances, have been going on virtually since the beginning’ (Salt 2011).



On 28 March the head of the Syrian Brotherhood, Muhammad Riyad Al-Shaqfa, issued a statement which left no doubt that the group’s aim was sectarian, the enemy was ‘the secular regime’ and Brotherhood members ‘have to make sure that the revolution will be pure Islamic, and with that no other sect would have a share of the credit after its success' (Al-Shaqfa 2011). While playing down the initial role of the Brotherhood, Sheikho confirms that it ‘went on to punch above its actual weight on the ground during the uprising … [due] to Turkish-Qatari support’, and to its general organisational capacity (Sheikho 2013).



The subsequent rise of a ‘Free Syrian Army’ (FSA) – never a centrally commanded army but rather a number of groups loosely coordinated through funders and arms suppliers – was presented in most western analysis as an organic development from the civilian protest marches, in combination with local self-defence committees. The Salafi-jihadi role was played down. One US analyst asserted: ‘The Syrian conflict began as a secular revolt against autocracy. Yet as the conflict protracts … [there is] a small but growing jihadist presence inside Syria … [President] Assad has used the threat of jihadists within the opposition to build support for the regime’ (O’Bagy 2012). Similarly, another US report from 2012 claims: ‘The vast majority of the opposition fighters are legitimate nationalists fighting for the country’s freedom and the establishment of a democratic state … most members within the FSA are pious rather than Islamists and are not motivated by sectarianism’ (Benotman and Naseraldin 2012: 1). Nevertheless, the latter report goes onto categorise the following FSA groups as ‘jihadis’, on the basis of their aim to establish an Islamic state: Jabhat al-Nusra (al Nusra Front), Liwaa’ al-Ummah (Brigade of the Nation), Sukur al-Sham (Falcons of the Levant), al-Dawla al-Islamiyya (the Islamic state) and Ahrar al-Sham (Benotman and Naseraldin 2012: 2).



Who then were these ‘vast majority’ of secular nationalists? The US-aligned International Crisis Group (ICG 2012), noting that ‘the presence of a powerful Salafi strand among Syria’s rebels has become irrefutable’, speaks of ‘a moderate Islamic tradition’ and suggests that two groups which ‘have yet to develop a firm ideology’ might be secular: the Farouq brigade and the Khalid bin Walid brigade, both based in Homs (ICG 2012: i, 6; also Abouzeid 2012a), and the main forces that seized part of that city over 2011-2012. The Farouq Battalion grew out of the Khalid bin Walid Brigade in early 2012 to become the largest single rebel group up to that point in the Syrian conflict (Holliday 2012: 21-22). The Wall Street Journal has called the Farouq brigade ‘pious Sunnis’ rather than Islamists (Malas 2013). In their English language media statements they distance themselves from al Qaeda linked groups, so as not to alienate western support; but in Syria they wear al Qaeda-style black shahada headbands and often sport salafi-style beards (Channel4News 2012); The BBC has called Farouq ‘moderately Islamist’, suggesting they exaggerate their Islamism ‘to attract financial support from the Gulf’ (Marcus 2013).



However, Mortada observes that, ‘most of the al-Farouq Battalion’s members are Salafis, armed and funded by Saudi Arabia while ‘Khalid Ibn al-Walid Battalion is loyal to and supported by the Muslim Brotherhood’ (Mortada 2012). In early April, the Farouq Battalion was accused of collecting Jizyah, or taxes imposed on non-Muslims living under Muslim rule, in Christian areas of Homs province (Al-Haqiqah 2012; Holliday 2012: 27). Sources in the Christian Orthodox Church then accused Farouq of the large scale ethnic cleansing of Christians that took place in Homs in early 2012 (Agenzia Fides 2012). Farouq has been defended by foreign sympathisers, some of whom said the tens of thousands of Christians who left Homs did so just because of the fighting (Al Tamimi 2012). This might be more credible if all the Muslim population of Homs had left, as well; but it did not. Farouq is credibly blamed for blowing up a hospital in Qusayr, to the Islamist chants of ‘Allahu Akhbar’ (0xnevvg3n22 2012); supporters posted the same footage online, blaming this bombing on ‘the regime’ (SyrianDaysOfRage 2012). Yet the Syrian Army does not engage in Islamist chants. If this is the ‘moderate FSA’, we should recall that it was a former Farouk commander, Khalid al Hamad who was infamously shown on video trying to eat a dead Syrian soldier’s heart (Greenfield 2013b). The Khalid Ibn al-Walid group is believed responsible for the use of a child to behead prisoners in Homs (HRI 2012). This is hardly ‘Moderate Islamism’.



While there are a number of other salafi-jihadi groups – such as Umar al-Khattab, Ali Ibn bi-Taleb, Abu Bakr al-Siddiq Rijal Allah, the Ali Ibn Abi-Taleb Brigade, Reef Dimashq Martyrs and al-Radeef al-Thawri (Mortada 2012), as well as various foreign salafi groups (including the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and the Pakistani Taliban), it is notable that none of the proponents of the ‘secular FSA’ theory seem able to present the names of such groups.



Two distinct features of the conflict attracted great attention in 2012. The first was the constant claims of Bashar al Assad ‘killing his own people’, linked to demands for foreign intervention. This story was driven by a corporate media which closely echoed the ‘regime change’ demands of the US, the UK and France. The UK Guardian, for example, ran a consistently partisan line against what was usually called ‘the Syrian regime’, portraying the conflict in simplistic and sectarian terms: ‘Assad the Alawite, versus the Sunni majority’(Greaves 2013). This is a line which pretends that Ba’athist secular nationalism does not exist. The western media often made use of partisan sources (such as the Free Syrian Army aligned, England-based ‘Syrian Observatory of Human Rights (SOHR) (McFarquar 2013). Nevertheless, two years into the conflict that same SOHR concluded that more than 40 percent of the causalities were government soldiers or pro-government civilians, casting doubt on its repeated assertion that the government of President Bashar al Assad was responsible for an overwhelming majority of the deaths (Enders 2013). British, US and French media sources were backed up by the media channels of Qatar (Al Jazeera) and Saudi Arabia (Al Arabiya), two gulf monarchies who were funding the armed opposition. In early 2012 a number of Al Jazeera journalists, mainly in the Beirut office, resigned over what they said was deliberate manipulation of the channel’s reports on Syria (RT 2012).



A series of claims over civilian massacres ‘by the regime’ were used by the armed opposition in ultimately unsuccessful attempts to secure air force backing from NATO countries. The claims were highly contested. The Syrian government said that the anti-government armed groups had either carried out the killings themselves or were citing killings of armed fighters as civilians. A number of independent articles and analyses have since been published on these massacres, so they will not be detailed here. However the contested accounts of violence include: the Houla massacre (see Anderson 2012; Lendman 2012), the Daraya massacre (see Fisk 2012), the Aqrab massacre (see Thompson 2012), repeated attacks on students at the University of Aleppo (Owen 2013) and the use of Sarin gas in Aleppo (see Hall 2013 and Lauria 2013). In each of these cases FSA spokespeople attempted to use the accusations to incite foreign military intervention.



The use of repeated civilian massacres in attempts to secure international ‘humanitarian’ intervention represents an awful novelty in the annals of war. It demonstrated the danger of that relatively new doctrine of a ‘responsibility to protect’, which had been successfully invoked to secure NATO intervention and thus destroy the Libyan government of Muammar Gaddafi, in 2011(Engdahl, 2011). It has since emerged that many of the accusations against Gaddafi were fabricated (Corbett 2011). While the same strategy had only limited success against the Syrian Government, if even some of the analyses of ‘false flag’ massacres are correct, the ‘responsibility to protect’ doctrine has set up an inducement for the killing of civilians.



The second distinct feature of the recent Syrian conflict has been the very large scale participation of foreign Salafi-jihadis, from a range of countries including Libya, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iraq, Chechnya, Pakistan and various parts of Europe (Komireddi 2012, Gertz 2013, Kern 2013). This factor demonstrated that the conflict was not simply a national one, between Syrian Islamists and the secular state. The Salafi and Brotherhood forces have been able to prolong their attacks because of the participation of thousands of outside fighters, most often paid by Qatar and Saudi Arabia and trained in Turkey (Draitser 2013).



The foreign powers have usually not been direct belligerents, mostly acting as funders, trainers and arms suppliers. The US, Britain and France have led a diplomatic offensive, attempting to isolate the Syrian government and to impose successive non-elected groups as the ‘legitimate representatives’ of the Syrian people (Barkan 2013). Along with their regional Islamist collaborators, in particular Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, they have funded and armed the various FSA groups. Turkey has provided training grounds and a staging post for attacks on northern Syria (Edmonds 2013). Qatar has funded the Brotherhood and has provided arms through Turkey, recruiting foreign fighters, for example from Yemen, to be trained by US Special Forces in Qatar before being sent to Syria (Al Alam 2013a). Saudi Arabia, which armed the insurrection from its beginning in March 2011, has backed various foreign Salafi-jihadi groups, including Pakistani Taliban (Press TV 2013).



The role of Israel was cryptic, at least until 2013 when the Zionist state carried out several direct missile attacks on Syria (Gordon 2013), then gave assistance to Islamist fighters on the Golan border (Israel Today 2013). It is clear that Israel backs the ousting of President Bashar al Assad. In 2012 head of Israel’s northern command, Major General Yair Golan, while focused on Syria’s formidable South Lebanon ally, Hezbollah, said ‘I would be very happy if [Assad] goes (Hayom 2012). Israel has issued what might be considered ‘smokescreen’ statements, saying they prefer secular Bashar to Islamist rebels (Times of Israel 2013), but this does not accord with the broader fear of what they call an ‘axis of evil’ between Iran, Syria and Hezbollah (Hayom 2013). Senior Israeli defence officials have made the issue plain, by saying that ‘al-Qaeda control over Syria would be preferable to a victory by Assad over the rebels’ (Pontz 2013; BICOM 2013). There are also reports that Israel is selling arms to the Saudis, for use by their client groups in Syria (Alalam 2013b). That is, although both al Qaeda type groups and Syria are seen by Israel as enemies, the squabbling, extremist sectarian groups are as a lesser risk than an organised and disciplined block across three countries. Israel is obsessed with breaking that nexus.



By late 2012 international support for the FSA had weakened somewhat, with widespread news of rebel atrocities (beheadings, public executions) and a steady fracturing of the image, carefully crafted over 2011 and 2012, that the ‘revolution’ was largely a secular uprising, with only marginal participation by religious extremists.



In November 2012, just a little more than six months after the US-led ‘Friends of Syria’ group had installed the exiled Syrian National Council (SNC) as the ‘legitimate representatives’ of the Syrian people, this group was demoted to a component of the ‘National Coalition of Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces’ (Barkan 2013: 1, 4). One of the foreign powers’ aims was said to be to reduce Muslim Brotherhood domination of the group. Despite this, the Brotherhood rapidly came to dominate both this new Coalition and the FSA’s ‘Supreme Military Command’ (SMC) (Draitser 2012). The SMC would gain influence by being made the principal channel of weapons. However two-thirds of the 30 members of this ‘Military Command’ were said to be associated with the Brotherhood, along with some other independent Salafi-Islamists (Barkan 2013: 5). Further, this FSA-SMC grouping does not include Jabhat al-Nusra, the Salafi group most closely linked to al Qaeda in Iraq. There is clearly considerable popular support, amongst the FSA, for al Nusra. When in 2012 the US declared al Nusra as ‘terrorist’, FSA fighters sprang to its defence, 29 FSA groups declaring ‘we are all al Nusra’ (Cockburn 2012). There is thus a loose and sometimes fractious alliance between the Salafi fighters. After entering the war in Qusayr, Hezbollah confirmed that most of the fighters were takfiri groups (Daily Star 2013).



In 2013 General Salim Idriss was appointed head of the SMC. He was an FSA leader in whom Washington was prepared to place some trust (Greenfield 2013a). Idriss made some weak attempts to distance himself from al Nusra, but admitted that [at least] 50 percent of the rebels were Islamists and that he could work ‘alongside’ al Nusra (Greenfield 2013a). Despite suggestions of a battle between the ‘moderate’ FSA and extremists, a series of reports have noted, first, that Islamist fighters dominate and, second, that the Muslim Brotherhood ‘has emerged as the leading western sanctioned force’ in the region, dominating both the SNC and the SMC (Draitser 2012; Barkan 2013). The rivalry between groups seems likely to be power struggles amongst Islamists. The New York Times has observed ‘nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of’ (Hubbard 2013). Others have noted that the FSA is selling arms to al Nusra (Roggio 2013). The myth of a secular uprising was losing traction, just as the rebels began to suffer significant military defeats, at Qusayr and Homs (Spencer 2013).



3. The Failure of Political Islam in Syria: some implications

In mid-2013, as internal and external forces began to shift in favour of the Syrian Government, mass protests against a Muslim Brotherhood-led government in Egypt led to a military coup.  President Mursi was deposed and, with him, the plans to constitutionally embed a sectarian regime. This coup also removed an important regional ally of the FSA. There was an immediate reaction from Syrian President Bashar al Assad: ‘What is happening in Egypt is essentially the fall of political Islam’. He reiterated the classical secular opposition to ‘using religion for politics’, linking sectarianism to its manipulation by foreign powers to divide the region (Al Assad 2013). It seemed that the rise of Islamism in the region had hit a rock (see El-Amine 2013), in the form of the popularly-backed secular armies of both Egypt and Syria. Indeed, after more than two years of foreign backed attacks, mostly from religious-fanatics, and including targeted ethnic killings, it is very hard to imagine how multi-cultural Syria could have survived without its popular and secular institutions, not least the Syrian Arab Army.



The Brotherhood in Syria, as in Egypt, pretended to represent all Sunnis. However this was not the experience in the largely Sunni city of Aleppo. The western media reported a series of FSA commanders in Aleppo complaining about lack of support from local people. 'I know they hate us' one told The Guardian (Abdul-Ahad 2012). Time magazine reported another saying: 'The Aleppans here, all of them, are loyal to the criminal Bashar, they inform on us' (Abouzeid 2012b). The alienation of Sunni Syrians, what to speak of the minorities, was confirmed by a report carried out for NATO. It estimated that 70% of the Syrian population backed President Assad, and that much of this support came from secular Sunnis who were horrified by FSA atrocities. ‘The people are sick of the war and hate the jihadists more than Assad’, a Western source familiar with the data said. ‘Assad is winning the war mostly because the people are cooperating with him against the rebels’ (World Tribune 2013; Al Manar 2013). The entry of Lebanon's Hezbollah into the Syrian fighting to re-take the town of al-Qusayr hardly represented a sectarian turn in the fighting. Hezbollah, linked to Shiia communities around al-Qusayr, was fighting alongside a secular Syrian Arab Army and in defence of the secular Syrian state. Hezbollah, despite being Shia Islamist, backs multi-religious political alliances in Lebanon and Syria and rejects Salafi 'takfiri' ideas (Haidar 2013).



The Syrian experience indicates that a Political Islam which has the sectarian Muslim Brotherhood and Wahhabism as its dominant currents cannot be a force for inclusive democratic development. This is a matter of history rather than theology. Conversely, the Shia Islamism represented by Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Islamic Republic in Iran has formed alliances across sectarian boundaries, rather than through sectarian politics, also for historical reasons. Shia Hezbollah, Shia Iran (along with secular Syria) have backed the Palestinians - both the secular PLO and Sunni Hamas - as part of an anti-imperialist alliance, and in face of Israeli aggression. There are very few Shia Muslims in Palestine. At home, Hezbollah maintains an alliance with the major Christian faction, thus forming part of the Lebanese Government (Mroueh 2013).



The wider lessons here have much to do with building strong, inclusive nation-states and regional alliances. At the moment Syria and Iran are the only states in the region without US military bases, and that independence attracts hostility. Washington’s hegemonic project over the last decade has been directed at domination of the entire region, and at breaking down independent and strong states. Yet strong states are well recognised as being necessary for participatory human development (Sengupta 2002: 847-8, 853) as well as for effective economic development (Johnson 1982; Amsden 1989). The state remains the principal means by which longer term investment in inclusive institutions, such as in mass education and public health can build both human capacity and strategic advantage for the former colonies. This requires substantial political will, especially in a world with big power ideology which – often in the name of ‘open markets’ and individual freedoms – seeks to disqualify that independent political will.



The experience in Latin America, too, shows that strong states and regional alliances are vital to resisting destabilisation from foreign powers. There is barely a country in Latin America that has not been subject to destabilisation, coup or invasion, backed by Washington (Grandin 2007; Blum 2005). The building of strong regional institutions like the ALBA, UNASUR and CELAC – instigated by the late President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela – is seen as an important counter-weight to such destabilisation (Weisbrot 2013). In the Middle East a similar broad and formal alliance – stretching across Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon to Egypt – would be a nightmare for the foreign powers but could form a great pillar of stable and inclusive development for the peoples of the region.



This paper has tried to demonstrate a series of inter-related propositions. First, the main forces of Political Islam in the Middle East – Wahhabism and the Muslim Brotherhood – have no capacity to build coherent national or regional structures, as they are mired in a sectarian and collaborationist history. Second, the foreign powers have consistently, for the last century, incited and worked with divisive and sectarian forces, specifically the Saudi Wahhabis and the Muslim Brotherhood, to help in their plans to dominate the region. Third, the main forces of Political Islam have been particularly sectarian and ‘takfiri’ in Syria, due to a long history of conflict with a firmly secular Ba’athist regime. Fourth, the 2011 insurrection in Syria, far from being a popular, secular revolt or a ‘revolution’, was the latest in a series of Islamist insurrections. The tragic violence has been prolonged by large scale foreign backing, including the import of thousands of foreign fighters. Fifth, the Salafi groups’ use of civilian massacres, in attempts to incite foreign military intervention, presents a dangerous new implication of the new doctrine of a ‘responsibility to protect’. It has set up an inducement for the killing of civilians, to attract partisan military support. Finally, it seems fairly plain that viable and inclusive democratic development in Syria, as in the region, requires secular development, in the sense of cross-community collaboration, with the prospect of forming a regional bloc capable of resisting foreign destabilisation. The recent Latin American experience suggests some valuable lessons.







Bibliography

Abdul-Ahad, Ghaith (2012) ‘The People of Aleppo needed someone to drag them into the revolution’, The Guardian, 28 December, online: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/28/aleppo-revolution-abu-ali-sulaibi

Abouzeid, Rania (2011) ‘Syria's Revolt, how graffiti stirred an uprising', Time, 22 March

Abouzeid, Rania (2012a) ‘Syria’s Up-and-Coming Rebels: Who Are the Farouq Brigades?’, Time, 5 October, online: http://world.time.com/2012/10/05/syrias-up-and-coming-rebels-who-are-the-farouq-brigades-2/

Abouzeid, Rania (2012b) 'Aleppo’s Deadly Stalemate: A Visit to Syria’s Divided Metropolis', Time, 14 November, online: http://world.time.com/2012/11/14/aleppos-deadly-stalemate-a-visit-to-syrias-divided-metropolis/

Agenzia Fides (2012) ‘Abuse of the opposition forces, "ethnic cleansing" of Christians in Homs,where Jesuits remains’, 21 March, online: http://www.fides.org/en/news/31228?idnews=31228&lan=eng#.Ufjy7qz4I64

Akhavi, Shahrough (1992) ‘The Clergy’s Concept of Rule in Egypt and Iran’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 524, Political Islam, November, 92-102

Al Alam (2013a) ‘Qatar intelligence chief dies of wounds in Somalia’, 7 May: http://en.alalam.ir/news/1472130

Al Alam (2013b) ‘Israel, Saudi Arabia ink deal to arm Syria militants’, 25 July, online: http://en.alalam.ir/news/1498344

al-Amin, Ibrahim (2012) ‘The Age of the New Takfiris’, Al Akhbar, 21 August, online: http://english.al-akhbar.com/node/11321

Al Assad, Bashar (2013) ‘President al-Assad to al-Thawra daily: Syria still home for all ... what is taking place in Egypt the fall of so-called Political Islam’, SANA, July 6, online: http://sana.sy/eng/21/2013/07/05/490658.htm

Al-Haqiqah (2012) ‘Farouq Battalion imposes Islamic Tax on villages in “Nasserite Valley”; Muslims in Baba Amr take refuge with Christians’, Al-Haqiqah Website in Arabic, April 9, 2012. http://www.syriatruth.info

Al Manar (2013) ‘NATO Study: Assad Winning War, 70% of Syrians Support Him’, 2 June, online: http://www.almanar.com.lb/english/adetails.php?eid=95909&cid=31&fromval=1

Al Jazeera (2011) ‘Daraa, a city under siege', 29 April

Al-Shaqfa, Muhammad Riyad (2011) 'Muslim Brotherhood Statement about the so-called ‘Syrian Revolution’’, General supervisor for the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, statement of 28 March, online at: http://truthsyria.wordpress.com/2012/02/12/muslim-brotherhood-statement-about-the-so-called-syrian-revolution/

Al Tamimi, Aymenn (2012) ‘Christians in Syria: Separating Fact from Fiction’, The Henry Jackson Society, Middle East Forum, November, online: http://www.meforum.org/3377/christians-in-syria

Amsden, Alice (1989) Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialisation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, Tim (2012) 'Syria’s ‘false flag’ terrorism, Houla and the United Nations', OpEdNews, online: http://www.opednews.com/articles/Syria-s-false-flag-terro-by-Tim-Anderson-120824-423.html

Ayoob, Mohammed (1979) ‘Two faces of Political Islam: Iran and Pakistan Compared’, Asian Survey, Vol. 19, No. 6, June, 535-546

Ayoob, Mohammed (2005) ‘The future of political Islam: the importance of external variables’, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), Vol 81, No 5, October, 951-961

Baker, Aryn (2013) ‘Savage online videos fuel Syria’s descent into madness’, Time magazine, 12 May, online: http://world.time.com/2013/05/12/atrocities-will-be-televised-they-syrian-war-takes-a-turn-for-the-worse/

Baktiari, Bahman and Augustus Richard Norton (2005) ‘Voices within Islam: four perspectives on tolerance and diversity’, Current History, January, 37-45

Barkan, L. (2013) ‘Syrian Opposition Forms Political Coalition, Joint Military Council Following Foreign Pressure’, Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), Inquiry & Analysis Series Report No. 919, January 14, online: http://www.memri.org/report/en/print6931.htm

Batatu, Hanna (1982) ‘Syria’s Muslim Brethren’, MERIP Reports, Middle East Research and Information project (MERIP), No 110, Syria’s troubles, Nov-Dec, 12-20, 34, 36

Benotman, Noman and Emad Naseraldin (2012) ‘The Jihadist Network in the Syrian Revolution, A Strategic Briefing’, Quilliam Institute, 20 September, online: http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/press-releases/quilliam-releases-concept-paper-the-jihadist-network-in-the-syrian-revolution/

BICOM (2013) 'Amos Gilad: Al-Qaeda threat not as serious as Syria-Iran-Hezbollah axis', 2 April, online: http://www.bicom.org.uk/news-article/13169/

Blum, William (2005) Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower, Common Courage Press, Monroe ME

British Embassy Cairo (1942) ‘First Fortnightly Meeting with Amin Osman Pacha’, 18 May, FO 141/838 (in Curtis 2012: 24)

Butterworth, Charles (1992) ‘Political Islam: the origins’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol 524, November, 26-37

Carroll, Terrance G. (1986) ‘Islam and Political Community in the Arab World’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2 (May), pp. 185-204

Channel4News (2012) ‘Inside Syria's Farouk Brigade’, YouTube, 11 September, online: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2krSHc02MIY

Churchill, W.S. (1921) Speeches: House of Commons: Speech notes, source material and Hansard, Reference code: CHAR 9/63, speech to the House of Commons, June 14, 1921

Churchill, W.S. (1953) Triumph and Tragedy, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston

Cockburn, Patrick (2012) ‘Syria: The descent into Holy War’, The Independent, 16 December, online: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/syria-the-descent-into-holy-war-8420309.html

Commins, David (2006) The Wahhabi Mission and Saudi Arabia, I.B. Tauris, London

Conazon, Joe (2007) ‘Seven countries in five years’, Salon, October 12, online: http://www.salon.com/2007/10/12/wesley_clark/

Corbett, James (2011) ‘The Assassination of Gaddafi – GRTV Backgrounder’ The Corbett Report, 1 November, online: http://www.corbettreport.com/the-assassination-of-gaddafi-grtv-backgrounder/

Curtis, Mark (2012) Secret Affairs: Britain’s collusion with radical Islam, Serpent’s Tail, London

Curzon, George Nathaniel (1899) Curzon, India and Empire: the Papers of Lord Curzon (1859-1925) from the Oriental and India Office Collections at the British Library, London

Daily Mail (2011) "Nine protesters killed after security forces open fire by Syrian mosque', 24 March

Daily Star (2013) ‘Takfiri groups predominate ranks of Syrian rebels: Hezbollah’, May 25, online: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Politics/2013/May-25/218353-takfiri-groups-predominate-ranks-of-syrian-rebels-hezbollah.ashx#axzz2aa6nupor

Desai, Akshayakumar Ramanlal (1948) Social Background of Indian Nationalism, Popular Book Depot, Bombay

DIA (1982) ‘Syria: Muslim Brotherhood Pressure Intensifies’, Defence Intelligence Agency (USA), May, online: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/files/fp_uploaded_documents/DIA-Syria-MuslimBrotherhoodPressureIntensifies.pdf

Draitser, Eric (2012) ‘Unmasking the Muslim Brotherhood: Syria, Egypt and beyond’, Global Research, 12 December, online: http://www.globalresearch.ca/unmasking-the-muslim-brotherhood-syria-egypt-and-beyond/5315406

Draitser, Eric (2013) Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the Struggle for Influence in Syria’, Global research, 9 July, online: http://www.globalresearch.ca/saudi-arabia-qatar-and-the-struggle-for-influence-in-syria/5342223

Edmonds, Sibel (2013) ‘Uber-Neocons: The Main Architects of Post-Assad Syria at Work’, Boiling Frogs, 5 May, http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2013/05/05/uber-neocons-the-main-architects-of-post-assad-syria-at-work/

El-Amine, Bilal (2013) ‘Political Islam’s Moment of Reckoning’, Al-Akhbar, 24 July, online: http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/political-islam%E2%80%99s-moment-reckoning

Enders, David (2013) Assad backers reportedly make up 43 percent of dead in Syria, June 3, online: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/06/03/192881/assad-backers-reportedly-make.html#.Ue8zUKz4I64

Engdahl, F. William (2011) ‘Humanitarian Neo-colonialism: Framing Libya and Reframing War’, Global Research, 4 may, online: http://www.globalresearch.ca/humanitarian-neo-colonialism-framing-libya-and-reframing-war/24617

Fisk, Robert (2012) ‘Robert Fisk: Inside Daraya - how a failed prisoner swap turned into a massacre’, The Independent, 29 August, online: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-inside-daraya--how-a-failed-prisoner-swap-turned-into-a-massacre-8084727.html

Gertz, Bill (2013) ‘Syria is jihad central: 6,000 terrorists flood new al Qaeda training ground’, The Washington Times, 2 July, online: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jul/2/syria-jihad-central-6000-terrorists-flood-new-al-q/?page=all

Gordon, Michael (2013) ‘Israel Airstrike Targeted Advanced Missiles That Russia Sold to Syria, U.S. Says’, New York Times, 13 July, online: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/14/world/middleeast/israel-airstrike-targeted-advanced-missiles-that-russia-sold-to-syria-us-says.html

Grandin, Greg (2007) Empire's Workshop: Latin America, the United States, and the Rise of the New Imperialism, Holt, New York

Greaves, Phil (2013) ‘Martin Chulov and the Guardian: at the forefront of Balkanising Syria’, July 23, online: http://notthemsmdotcom.wordpress.com/2013/07/23/martin-chulov-and-the-guardian-at-the-forefront-of-balkanising-syria/

Greenfield, Daniel (2013a) ‘Obama to Rely on Syrian Leader Who Claims Al Qaeda Aren’t Terrorists to Keep Weapons Out of Al Qaeda’s Hands’, Frontpage Mag, April 30, online: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obama-to-rely-on-syrian-leader-who-claims-al-qaeda-arent-terrorists-to-keep-our-weapons-out-of-al-qaedas-hands/

Greenfield, Daniel (2013b) ‘Moderate Islamist Free Syrian Army Commander Who Ate Heart, Vows Genocide’, Front Page Mag, 14 may, online: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/moderate-islamist-free-syrian-army-commander-who-ate-heart-vows-mass-genocide/

Haidar, Marwa (2013) ‘Sayyed Nasrallah: Mistaken Who Thinks That Takfiris Can Change Our Position’, Al Manar, 14 June, online: http://www.almanar.com.lb/english/adetails.php?eid=97620&cid=23&fromval=1

Hall, Richard (2013) ‘UN's Carla Del Ponte says there is evidence rebels 'may have used sarin' in Syria’, The Independent, 6 May, online: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/uns-carla-del-ponte-says-there-is-evidence-rebels-may-have-used-sarin-in-syria-8604920.html

Hansen, Suzy (2012) ‘The Economic Vision of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood Millionaires’, Bloomberg Businessweek, 19 April, online: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-04-19/the-economic-vision-of-egypts-muslim-brotherhood-millionaires

Hayom, Israel (2012) Iran, Hezbollah are 'up to their necks' in Syria, says Israeli general’, Israel Hayom Blog, April 6, online: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=3857

Holliday, Joseph (2012) ‘Syria’s Maturing Insurgency’, Middle East Security Report 5, Institute for the Study of War, June, Washington

Hourani, A.H. (1947) Minorities in the Arab World, Oxford University Press, London

HRI (2012) ‘Syrian rebels use a child to behead a prisoner’, Human Rights Investigations, 10 December, online: http://humanrightsinvestigations.org/2012/12/10/syrian-rebels-use-a-child-to-behead-a-prisoner/

Hubbard, Ben (2013) ‘Islamist Rebels Create Dilemma on Syria Policy’, New York Times, April 27, online: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/world/middleeast/islamist-rebels-gains-in-syria-create-dilemma-for-us.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

HRW (2011) ‘We've never seen such horror: crimes against humanity by Syrian Security Forces’, Human Rights Watch, New York, June, online: http://www.hrw.org/reports/2011/06/01/we-ve-never-seen-such-horror-0

ICG (2012) ‘Tentative Jihad: Syria’s Fundamentalist Opposition’, International Crisis Group, 12 October, online: http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/Middle%20East%20North%20Africa/Iraq%20Syria%20Lebanon/Syria/131-tentative-jihad-syrias-fundamentalist-opposition

IRIN (2007) ‘IRAQ: Sunni extremists threaten to kill Christian converts in north’, IRIN News, 12 may, online: http://www.irinnews.org/report/72266/iraq-sunni-extremists-threaten-to-kill-christian-converts-in-north

Israel Today (2013) ‘Israeli hospital treats Syrian rebel fighters’, 17 February, online: http://www.israeltoday.co.il/NewsItem/tabid/178/nid/23683/Default.aspx 

Johnson, Chalmers (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Keddie, Nikki R. (2006) Women in the Middle East: Past and Present, Princeton University Press

Kern, Soeren (2013) ‘European Jihadists: The Latest Export’, Gatestone Institute, 21 march, onloine: http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3634/european-jihadists

Khashoggi, Jamal (2013) The expanding Shiite Crescent, Al Abarbiya, June 15, online: http://english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2013/06/16/The-expanding-Shiite-Crescent-.html

Komireddi, Kapil (2012) ‘Takfiri militants from Pakistan are fighting in Syria with an anti-Semitic cause’, 21 September, online: http://lubpak.com/archives/228501

Krishna, Katragadda Bala (1939) The Problem of Minorities or Communal Representation in India, George Allen And Unwin, London

Lauria, Joe (2013) ‘Russia Says Syrian Rebels Used Sarin Gas: Report To U.N. Says Rocket Fired At Aleppo in March’, Wall Street Journal, July 9, online: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324507404578596153561287028.html

Leiken, Robert S. and Steven Brooke (2007) ‘The Moderate Muslim Brotherhood’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 86, No. 2 (Mar. - Apr.), 107-121

Lendman, Stephen (2012) ‘America’s War on Syria: Another Anti-Assad False Flag?’, Global research, may 13, online: http://www.globalresearch.ca/americas-war-on-syria-another-anti-assad-false-flag/5334919

Lia, Brynjar (1998) The Society of Muslim Brothers in Egypt: the rise of an Islamic mass movement 1928-1942, Uthaca, p.181

Malas, Nour (2013) ‘As Syrian Islamists Gain, It's Rebel Against Rebel’, Wall Street Journal, 29 may, online: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323975004578499100684326558.html

Marcus, Jonathan (2013) Gruesome Syria video pinpoints West's dilemma, BBC, 14 May, online: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22521161

McFarquar, Neil (2013) ‘A Very Busy Man Behind the Syrian Civil War’s Casualty Count’, NYT, April 9, online: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/10/world/middleeast/the-man-behind-the-casualty-figures-in-syria.html?pagewanted=all&_r=2&

Mehta, Ashok and A. Patwardhan (1942) The Communal Triangle, Kitabistan, Allahabad

Mortada, Radwan (2012) Syria Alternatives (II): no homegrown solutions, Al Akhbar, 13 June, online: http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/syria-alternatives-ii-no-homegrown-solutions

Mroueh, Wassim (2013) ‘Aoun, Hezbollah ties resilient so far’, The Daily Star, 31 may, online: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Local-News/2013/May-31/218981-aoun-hezbollah-ties-resilient-so-far.ashx#axzz2aa6nupor

Najjar, Fauzi M. (1968) ‘Islam and Socialism in the United Arab Republic’, Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 3 No. 3, The Middle East, July, 183-199

Nazemroaya, Mahdi Darius (2006) Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East”, Global research, November 18, online: http://www.globalresearch.ca/plans-for-redrawing-the-middle-east-the-project-for-a-new-middle-east/3882

O’Bagy, Elizabeth (2012) ‘Jihad in Syria’, Middle East Security Report 6, Institute for the Study of War, Washington, online: http://www.understandingwar.org/report/jihad-syria

Owen, Paul (2013) ‘Syria: Russia blames opposition 'terrorists' for attack on Aleppo University – as it happened’, The Guardian, 17 January, online: http://www.theguardian.com/world/middle-east-live/2013/jan/16/syria-us-denies-assad-regime-has-used-chemical-weapons-live-updates

0xnevvg3n22 (2012) ‘Free Syrian Army Terrorist Savages Blow Up a Hospital filled with people in Homs/Syria’, YouTube, 5 September, online: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yycouE-I7V4

Pande, B. N. (1987) ‘History in the Service of Imperialism’, (speech in the Indian Upper House of Parliament, the Rajya Sabha, made on 29 July 1977) online: http://www.cyberistan.org/islamic/pande.htm

Parker, J.S.F. (1962) ‘The United Arab Republic’, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), Vol. 38 No. 1, January, 15-28

Pew Research Centre (2013) ‘The World’s Muslims: religion, politics and society’, Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, April 30, online: http://www.pewforum.org/Muslim/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society.aspx

Pontz, Zach (2013) ‘Israeli Officials: We’d Prefer Al-Qaeda-Run Syria to an Assad Victory’, The Algemeiner, June 4, online: http://www.algemeiner.com/2013/06/04/israeli-officials-wed-prefer-al-qaeda-run-syria-to-an-assad-victory/

Press TV (2013) ‘Pakistani Taliban set up base in Syria: Report;, 31 July, online: http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/07/12/313534/taliban-set-up-base-in-syria-report/

Queenan, Gavriel (2011) "Syria: Seven Police Killed, Buildings torched in protests', Israel National News, Arutz Sheva, March 21

Reuters (2011) ‘Syria's security forces seize arms smuggled from Iraq’, 12 march, online: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/11/syria-seizes-arms-from-iraq

Roggio, Bill (2013) ‘Free Syrian Army Arming Al Qaeda, ISIL Commander Claims’, Transcend Media, 22 July, online: http://www.transcend.org/tms/2013/07/free-syrian-army-arming-al-qaeda-isil-commander-claims/

RT (2012) ‘Al Jazeera exodus: Channel losing staff over ‘bias’’, 13 March, online: http://rt.com/news/al-jazeera-loses-staff-335/

Salt, Jeremy (2011) ‘Truth and Falsehood in Syria’, The Palestine Chronicle, 5 October, online: http://72.29.89.109/~palchron/old/view_article_details.php?id=17159

Seale, Patrick (1988) Asad: the struggle for the Middle East, University of California Press, Berkeley CA

Sengupta, Arjun (2002) On the Theory and Practice of the Right to Development. Human Rights Quarterly, (24), 837-889.

Shadid, Mohammad K. (1988) ‘The Muslim Brotherhood movement in the West Bank and Gaza’, Third World Quarterly, Vol 10, No 2, April, 658-682

Sheikh, Naveed Shahzad (2007) The New Politics of Islam: Pan-Islamic Foreign Policy in a World of States, Routledge, Oxford

Sheikho, Youssef (2013) ‘The Syrian Opposition’s Muslim Brotherhood Problem’, Al Akhbar English, April 10, online: http://english.al-akhbar.com/node/15492

Spencer, Richard (2013) ‘Syrian rebels vow to fight on after Qusayr defeat’, The Telegraph, 5 June, online: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10101448/Syrian-rebels-vow-to-fight-on-after-Qusayr-defeat.html

SyrianDaysOfRage (2012) (9-3-12) Qaseer | Homs | Regime Forces Bomb The Hospital’, YouTube, 3 September, online: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUisEPJaq9k

Talhamy, Yvette (2009) ‘The Syrian Muslim Brothers and the Syrian-Iranian Relationship, Middle East Journal, Vol. 63 No. 4, Autumn, 561-580

Teitelbaum, Joshua (2004) ‘The Muslim Brotherhood and the ‘Struggle for Syria, 1947-1958. Between Accommodation and Ideology’, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol 40, No 3, May, 134-158

Thompson, Alex (2012) Was there a massacre in the Syrian town of Aqrab?’ 4 News, 14 December, online: http://blogs.channel4.com/alex-thomsons-view/happened-syrian-town-aqrab/3426

Times of Israel (2013) ‘Israel prefers Bashar Assad to Islamist rebels’, May 18, online: http://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-prefers-assad-to-islamist-rebels/

Truth Syria (2012) "Syria -- Daraa revolution was armed to the teeth from the very beginning', BBC interview with Anwar Al-Eshki,YouTube, 10 April

Weisbrot, Mark (2013) ‘Piñera Praises Chávez at CELAC Summit; Media Influences Public Opinion on Venezuela But Not So Much Governments’, CEPR, 29 January, online: http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/the-americas-blog/pinera-praises-chavez-at-celac-summit-media-influences-public-opinion-but-not-so-much-governments

Wikeley (1945) ‘Memorandum: Anglo American Relations in Saudi Arabia’, Public record office, 28 Dec 1945, FO 371/45543/E10148

Wood, Charles (1862) Wood Papers, India Office Library, MSS, Eur, F78, Charles Wood to Viceroy Lord Elgin (Governor General of India), March 3, 1862

World Tribune (2013) 'NATO data: Assad winning the war for Syrians’ hearts and minds', 31 May, online: http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/05/31/nato-data-assad-winning-the-war-for-syrians-hearts-and-minds/

Zernike, Kate and Michael T. Kaufman (2011) ‘Obituary: The Most Wanted Face of Terrorism’, New York Times, May 2, online: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/02/world/02osama-bin-laden-obituary.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0