Skip to main content

‘US is overwhelmingly partial to Israel,’ Pelosi admits at AIPAC Philip Weiss on March 28, 2017

Nancy Pelosi gushes at AIPAC, March 28, 2017






‘US is overwhelmingly partial to Israel,’ Pelosi admits at AIPAC
 Philip Weiss on March 28, 2017


Did you watch the outpouring of official support for Israel at the annual Washington conference of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee)? Washington is bitterly divided over every issue from climate change to health care to tax reform to the legitimacy of the presidency. But on Israel, there is no breakage– yet.
Yet, because the politicians protest so much and the pageant is so slick, scripted, and luxurious that a reasonable person has to turn away from the screen in disgust at the pledges of loyalty to another country. “Foreign aid to Israel is sacred, we know that. That is sacred,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said when discussing budget cuts. Her counterpart in the Senate also spoke of God. “I pledge to you today as long as Hachem [God in Hebrew] breathes air into my lungs,” Chuck Schumer said, “I will fight to make Israel a safer more secure, more prosperous nation!” Schumer said that our politics are “more polarized than ever,” but we can’t undermine bipartisan support for Israel, “because the Jewish state is too important.”
The fervor was matched in Christian terms by Vice President Mike Pence. He boasted of his faith and pledged, “President Trump and I stand without apology for Israel and we always will.”
Whatever their differences, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy and Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer acted like best friends on stage at AIPAC. They bragged about all the politicians they bring over with them on trips to Israel. Hundreds go every year on the Israel-lobby-paid junkets. They learn nothing about Palestinian conditions but a lot about the Holocaust, as a justification for the existence of a Jewish state.
If the conference looked more like the Emperor’s New Clothes than a spontaneous expression of support, it is because the politicians know there are cracks in the facade. Trump’s love affair with Netanyahu is making the issue more and more uncomfortable for Democrats. Pelosi was defensive when she confessed this morning at AIPAC:
“When people sometimes say to me, the United States is so overwhelmingly partial to Israel in this discussion, I say ‘Yes of course. We have been friends for a long time. We have shared values.'”
It was the one glimmer of dysfunction in the staged rounds of sacrifice, but it spoke volumes. Progressive Democrats are starting to see through the special relationship to Israel’s human rights violations. In the Washington Post today, even Israel-devotee Richard Cohen wearied of combatting the apartheid label when he’s forced to acknowledge there are Jewish only roads in the West Bank: “while recoiling from the word ‘apartheid,’ [Israel has] adopted some of its techniques.”
How many people have noticed that PEN America (led by a Clintonite) is holding its annual world literary festival this spring without money from Israel, following a campaign against the sponsorship by leading writers? Two Democratic former congressmen said at a teach-in about AIPAC last week that politicians are overwhelmingly partial to Israel because of campaign contributions, but the support for Palestinians is slowly rising– to 80. Bernie Sanders didn’t appear at AIPAC last year, or this year either, for good reason. He actually talks about the occupation, and young Democrats want him to.
Schumer himself sounded a defensive note when he said that some want the United States “to retreat from the world stage.” But he quickly branded those people as akin to Charles Lindbergh, before issuing the neoconservative/neoliberal call to arms: “A strong America in the world is very good for Israel.”
There were several stirring demonstrations against AIPAC this year. Code Pink led an effort to shut down the conference. The anti-lobby conference got an overflow audience at the National Press Club. The young Jews of IfNotNow unfurled banners inside AIPAC and called on the Jewish community to end its support for the occupation, then sang biblical imprecations against war. They are by their own description the Jewish Resistance, fighting the Jewish Establishment, in the 50th year of the occupation.
I saw no mainstream US coverage of these demonstrations– even as the media gave top billing to the demonstrations against Vladimir Putin across Russia. Yes, the Russian demonstrations are far larger, and very important; but both protests address human and civil rights violations, and the tyrannical orthodoxy of deep states.
Russia is of course another issue that bitterly divides Washington politicians. The Democrats are pushing a new cold war, and the cable networks cannot stop talking about Russian influence in the Trump administration. As if Wikileaks kept Hillary Clinton from visiting Wisconsin, or as if we don’t share an interest in peace in the Middle East. Chris Matthews is outraged by the several visits of Trump operatives to Russia, a country he brags that he has never been to.
Matthews has been to Israel, of course, along with his bosses at Comcast, and all those politicians at AIPAC. When will that devotion become controversial? Sooner than you think.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An overview of the 1934 Toledo Auto-Lite strike - Philip A. Korth & Margaret R. Beegle

LIBCOM.ORG A summary by Philip A. Korth and Margaret R. Beegle of the 1934 Toledo Auto-Lite strike. Originally appeared as the second chapter of I remember like today: the Auto-Lite strike of 1934, an oral history. The strikes at Auto-Lite in Toledo in the spring of 1934 secured a victory for the fledgling Automobile Workers Federal Union Local 18384 of the AFL and permanently altered the nature of worker-employer relationships in Toledo. This victory assured that working men and women in Toledo would have some power over their working lives and a voice in their community. Workers in Toledo today owe a debt of gratitude to the "unholy thirteen" who huddled over the fires burning in drums in front of Auto-Lite and who dreamed of freedom and dignity. And as today grows out of yesterday, so the workers in 1934 faced a set of conditions and attitudes shaped decades before by the industrial evolution of Toledo, the development of the automobile industry, and the historical strugg…

Ukrainian Labour Temple in Winnipeg a national historic site,10 Aug. 2009, NUGPE

http://www.nupge.ca/node/2478



Landmark site was a hub of activity during the Winnipeg General Strike of 1919 and it has long been of great historic significance to the Canadian labour movement.

Winnipeg (10 Aug. 2009) - The Ukrainian Labour Temple in Winnipeg's North End – a focal point of the Winnipeg General Strike of 1919 – has been designated a national historic site by the federal government.

The Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada says the designation recognizes the architectural significance of the building and "the important role it played in the social and cultural activities of Ukrainian Canadians."
The Ukranian Labour Temple was a centre of trade union activity during the historic Winnipeg General Strike of 1919

Built in 1918-19, the structure is the first and largest Ukrainian labour temple erected in Canada. It was built primarily by volunteer labour and financed by donations and served as a key hub for Ukrainian culture and political activism at the tim…

A US-Supported Coup in the Making in Nicaragua by Carlos Dada, 10 July, 2018

Jacinto Suarez, a legislator and the International Secretary of the Daniel Ortega’s FSLN, tells El Faro it’s all a conspiracy “to overturn the government”. Likewise, he justifies the use of paramilitary forces to aid the Police. Photo: Fred Ramos
By “the oligarchy, the drug dealers and the poor people on the right”
By Carlos Dada(El Faro / Confidencial) HAVANA TIMES – In Nicaragua the media that don’t belong to the government or the presidential family are overflowing with voices demanding the exit of President Daniel Ortega, but there are very few individual Sandinista voices there. The responsibility for such views falls mainly on the Sandinista Front Party and the public officials.  They won’t talk to reporters. There’s generally only an official version, delivered directly by the Vice President Rosario Murillo, using the government’s own communications media. That’s why an interview with Jacinto Suarez merits a higher profile.  Suarez is one of the most influential men in the FSLN. …